Could this be a reference to Dr. Who? --85.216.121.214 06:27, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Time Lord in Ultima II?[]
How do people feel towards that speculatory line about the Time Lord's "implied" involvement in Ultima II? I concede that he would be the most likely candidate to have repaired any timeline damage, but I'm still not entirely comfortable with the comment being there. --Terilem 07:05, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
- I think "it is implied" should be changed to "it is possible." This would still make it speculation, but somewhat less grievous. --Polygoncount 07:09, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
- I'm not convinced there's any need for speculation at all. Like I mentioned in a past talk page, the games stand on their own and it is not our job to rationalize any errors, plot holes or missing information. The Time Lord had not been introduced into the series yet, so why should we even mention him? --Warder Dragon 10:26, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
- I'm all for taking it out. -- Fenyx4 13:35, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
- I think that, in general, speculation should be removed, because of the same reaons Warder Dragon states. I feel that, however, a little speculation may be ok in the Trivia section of each article, if it is a somewhat pertinent speculation. In this specific case, it may be good to state in the article that there is no mention of the Time Lord being involed with the events of Ultima II. If we put this notice, we are removing the doubt that there may be some relation that no one has looked into yet, and preventing further speculation, as the issue is already addressed explicitly.--Sega381 16:14, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
- I'm all for taking it out. -- Fenyx4 13:35, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
- I'm not convinced there's any need for speculation at all. Like I mentioned in a past talk page, the games stand on their own and it is not our job to rationalize any errors, plot holes or missing information. The Time Lord had not been introduced into the series yet, so why should we even mention him? --Warder Dragon 10:26, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
- I think "it is implied" should be changed to "it is possible." This would still make it speculation, but somewhat less grievous. --Polygoncount 07:09, June 30, 2010 (UTC)